For years, UK-listed technology and biotechnology companies moaned about how they could get a higher valuation if their shares traded on the US market. Some added a secondary listing, others ditched the UK completely and parked their shares across the Atlantic. It was a trend that bubbled away, but not a mainstream activity.

That’s now changing after several larger companies across non-tech sectors hinted that they might do the same. Construction group CRH (CRH) is getting ready to move its primary listing to the US, where it does a lot of business. Gambling provider Flutter (FLTR) is considering the same, reports suggest oil producer Shell (SHEL) has looked at a US listing, while plumbing supplies group Ferguson (FERG) made the move last year.

Switching their main stock market listing to the US would mean such UK-listed companies would no longer qualify for inclusion in the FTSE indices. Plenty of others could follow suit. For example, construction equipment group Ashtead (AHT), credit agency Experian (EXPN), education publisher Pearson (PSON) and energy network provider National Grid (NG.) are all FTSE 100 names with large US operations.

An exodus of companies from the mid and large cap FTSE indices would not instill much confidence in businesses thinking about listing their shares on the London Stock Exchange.

Many overseas investors turned their back on the UK market after the Brexit vote in 2016, preferring to look elsewhere for growth opportunities. If you were a chief executive considering the UK as a stock listing location, the idea that a big pool of investors is not interested in the market and valuations are depressed versus other parts of the world, immediately presents some red flags.

There has barely been a trickle of companies worth more than £1 billion coming onto the UK market since the UK voted to leave the EU. It’s no wonder London Stock Exchange (LSEG) has been eager to relax the rules to attract more companies and entrepreneurs. That’s not the right way to go about it. UK listing reforms need to see standards raised, not lowered.

Plenty of companies that joined the UK stock market in recent years have been mired in controversy, such as Alphawave IP (AWE), Darktrace (DARK) and Deliveroo (ROO). Even the most recent listing, Dar Global (DAR), leaves a bad taste in the mouth. The Saudi property developer’s prospectus contains 17 pages of risk warnings including details of project delays, a customer dispute and a major shareholder in a court battle. The top shareholder owns 88% of the shares so one has to wonder why it bothered to list at all.

Despite some bad eggs, there are still plenty of good opportunities for investors among companies already listed in the UK. My key concern is the shrinking size of the market.

If you rewind to a few years before the Brexit announcement, stock
market listings included Worldpay, Esure, Auto Trader (AUTO) and Pets at Home (PETS). These established, well-known companies gave the public the opportunity to own a slice of their business. We’d like more of the same, please.

Unfortunately, the risk is growing that companies of such calibre go to a different market to get a better valuation. That would be terrible for the future of the UK stock market.

‹ Previous2023-03-09Next ›