All change: an unusual period for FTSE 100 CEOs
More than a fifth (22) of FTSE 100 companies have either changed their chief executive this year or announced plans to do so next year.
So what’s causing this turmoil at the top? ‘The FTSE 100 has not really gone anywhere for two years excluding dividends so individual CEOs have been under more pressure from investors,’ says Patrick Thomas, an investment director at Canaccord Genuity Wealth Management.
‘This has attracted the attention of activist investors particularly from the US who have been turning the screw. Changing the management is usually part of the package in their strategy for turning a company around.’
Despite the lack of growth from the UK’s benchmark index, Thomas rejects the notion that the number of CEO exits is reflective of a wider economic malaise.
He points out there are plenty of ‘non-bad reasons’ why a CEO has left a company, such as retirement or being a short-term appointment to execute a turnaround strategy.
In addition, it’s not worth investors getting too hung up on the identity of the person in the hot seat.
Often the success or failure of a business isn’t hugely reliant on a particular individual.
For example, a major pressure on banking profits is the downward trend in global interest rates, but there’s nothing much the permanent successor to John Flint at HSBC (HSBA) will be able to do about that.
Looking at the list of FTSE 100 bosses to have left their posts this year, Canaccord Genuity Wealth Management senior equity analyst Simon McGarry says there have been examples of companies in need of a shake-up – specifically Aviva (AV.), British American Tobacco (BATS), Imperial Brands (IMB) and Land Securities (LAND).
Then there is Smith & Nephew (SN.), whose boss decided to step down after a row over pay. McGarry says that very large pay packages are now increasingly hard to justify.
While there are a number of reasons why a boss might quit a company, historically there has been a spike in CEO exits before recessionary years, the idea being that they bail out before things get messy.
‘There may be instances where the executive feels now is a good time to go, to ensure their legacy looks like a good one,’ says Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell.
The acceleration of boardroom changes has been viewed by investors as a sign of pessimism about the future. Conversely, if the rate of exits began to slow, the economic picture would undoubtedly look a lot brighter again.