Land Securities shares crumble as rents and asset values slide

Writer,

Archived article

Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.

Land Securities’ shares are on the slide after its results and it is hard to work out what is upsetting investors more – the cancellation of the fourth quarter dividend; a £23 million provision against next year’s rental income; a drop in net tangible value per share that wipes out most of the increases seen in the previous five years or management’s forecast that economic activity may not return to pre-Covid-19 levels until 2022. This testing quartet means the shares trade no higher now than they did in summer 2010, in the wake of the Great Financial Crisis, and at a 55% discount to their £11.92 net tangible value per share, a figure which means investors think rents and property values are going to stay under pressure for some time to come.

Source: Refinitiv data

It is easy to accentuate the negatives when you look at the FTSE 100 firm’s results. Rental income fell to a six-year low as Land Securities booked a £23 million provision against the new financial year’s rental income. More than four-fifths of that charge was taken against expected income from retail customers and the rest from the company’s specialist assets, which include cinemas and hotels. The firm collected barely two-thirds of rental income in March and April within ten days of the due date, compared to 94% a year ago, although office occupancy rates are holding firm and 89% rents were collected on time (even if the number of people actually working there is down by 90%).

Source: Company accounts. Financial year to March.

Pressure on rents and weaker valuations for leisure facilities post-Covid-19, as well as retail parks and regional retail sites in particular weighed on the overall group’s net tangible value, which fell 12% to £11.92p a share.

Over the year, office valuations rose 1% but specialist sites lost 8% of their value and the value of Land Securities’ retail assets was lowered by 21%.

Source: Company accounts. Financial year to March. Net tangible value per share metric adopted under EPRA rules for 2020, with 2019 restated.

Shareholders will also be casting a careful eye at Land Securities’ balance sheet. The REIT’s loan-to-value ratio of 30.7% is way below the near-50% level seen during the Great Financial Crisis but this is mainly because of rising asset valuations, rather than falling debt. Sustained pressure on the 46% of the portfolio that is retail and leisure related could force that ratio higher, even if the £6.9 billion office portfolio holds relatively firm.

Source: Company accounts. Financial year to March.

Yet much of this will be little surprise to investors, so the question they need to be asking themselves is to what degree is this already factored into the valuation. At 540p, Land Securities is trading at a 55% discount to net tangible value, a level which factors in further big drops in asset values and rental incomes.

  Share price Historic NAV Premium / (discount)
Safestore 677.8 452 49.90%
Big Yellow 982.8 770.4 27.60%
SEGRO 824.1 708 16.40%
Londonmetric Property 191.3 174.9 9.30%
TRITAX Big Box  126.6 151.1 (16.2%)
Great Portland Estates 631.8 868 (27.2%)
Derwent London 2,858.00 3,958.00 (27.8%)
St. Modwen 330 504.2 (34.5%)
Helical 316.5 486 (34.9%)
Workspace 712 1,115.00 (36.1%)
Harworth 95 155.6 (38.9%)
CLS 186.5 329.2 (43.3%)
Shaftesbury 550.8 982 (43.9%)
Capital & Counties 150.1 293 (48.8%)
Land Securities 539.5 1,192.00 (54.7%)
British Land 345.3 856 (59.7%)
Town Centre Securities 133.5 343 (61.1%)
RDI 49.6 185.5 (73.3%)
Newriver  61.8 244 (74.7%)
Hammerson 47.5 601 (92.1%)
INTU 5.1 147 (96.5%)

Source: Refinitiv data, last published net asset or net tangible value per share figure from company accounts

The business still has a purpose in that it provides tenants with the facilities they need to operate. It is tempting to think that none of us will ever need to work in an office again, but that it not likely to be the case. Winter weather will make working from home less appealing than it is now in spring, boredom will set in as the novelty wears off and the lack of human interaction could be as bad for mental health as the lack of exercise is for physical health.

In addition, Land Securities’ assets are heavily skewed toward London, a global city whose appeal to investors, especially overseas ones, is likely to dim for long. The UK offers rule of law, so assets cannot be appropriated, an independent central bank and a cheap currency for starters.

As CEO Mark Allan stresses, the REIT can make itself an integral part of designing offices which are best-suited to a post-Covid world, in terms of access to and movement within them. Moreover, the company is already looking to repurpose four sites in London that are currently purely retail so they become mixed use, with a residential property element. To say those sites have little or no value is surely not correct and the job for investors to gauge now is whether sentiment is sufficiently washed out and valuations sufficiently lowly for the REIT to be worth another look at a potential investment.

These articles are for information purposes only and are not a personal recommendation or advice.


russmould's picture
Written by:
Russ Mould

Russ Mould has 28 years' experience of the capital markets. He started at Scottish Equitable in 1991 as a fund manager and in 1993 he joined SG Warburg, now part of UBS investment bank, where he worked as equity analyst covering the technology sector for 12 years. Russ joined Shares in November 2005 as technology correspondent and became Editor of the magazine in July 2008. Following the acquisition of Shares' parent company, MSM Media by AJ Bell Group, he was appointed AJ Bell’s Investment Director in summer 2013.