Archived article

Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.

We compare products that use MSCI, FTSE and Solactive indices

I’ve been looking at ETFs as a cheap way of getting exposure to lots of global stocks but I’ve seen different products with different names, including ones which seem to track the FTSE All-World index and MSCI World index. Is there any difference between  the two?


You’re off to a good start, as one of the lowest cost ways to get started with investing in stock markets is through exchange-traded funds, and a popular way to get diversified exposure is through a global ETF, a type of tracker fund.

Before picking any ETF that has ‘world’ or ‘global’ in the name, there are a few things to consider, most notably which basket of stocks it tracks.

Two of the main indices used are the MSCI World and FTSE All-World. Others which are employed include global indices from Morningstar, S&P and Solactive, but the MSCI and FTSE ones are far more commonly tracked by ETFs.

Both have similar top 10 constituents featuring US giants Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft and Tesla but there are important differences between the two, which mostly stem from the fact the FTSE All-World includes emerging market companies alongside those in developed markets while the MSCI World is exclusively tracking developed market equities.

This has implications for their US exposure, for example. Around 66.5% of the MSCI index is made up of US stocks compared to 56.6% for the FTSE index. The latter also has the world’s largest semiconductor company, Taiwan Semiconductor, in its top 10 while the MSCI index does not.

Generally speaking, the FTSE index also has more exposure to Asia, with a 12.3% weighting to stocks in China, Hong Kong and Japan, making it a more diversified option.

As the chart shows this has resulted in subtly but still noticeably different performance over the past decade.

When picking an ETF, another issue to consider is cost. ETFs are one of the lowest cost ways generally to put your money to work in the stock market, and keeping costs down is important in boosting your investment returns.

The global ETF with the lowest charge is Amundi Prime Global (PRIW), which costs just 0.05% a year and follows the Solactive Global Developed Markets Large and Mid Cap USD Index, but its relatively lower level of assets under management at $365 million means the cost between buying and selling, called the bid/offer spread, could be higher and materially increase the total cost of trading the product.

More popular options tracking the MSCI World include Lyxor Core MSCI World (LCWL) which costs 0.12% a year and has $1.1 billion in assets, and iShares Core MSCI World (SWDA), which costs 0.2% a year and has $40 billion  in assets.

Vanguard FTSE All-World (VWRL) tracks the FTSE index and has an ongoing charge of 0.22% as well as assets of $8.7 billion.

‹ Previous2021-07-01Next ›