Archived article

Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.

The latest turmoil in the country may be flying under the radar but it could create real problems
Thursday 12 Nov 2020 Author: Russ Mould

It may seem churlish to worry, given the enthusiastic response the markets are giving to news of the Phase III Covid-19 vaccine trial by Pfizer and BioNTech, but investors need to keep an eye on Turkey once more.

The Turkish lira is on the slide and Ankara is facing what could yet become its second economic crisis in just three years.

Thankfully the situation is not yet comparable with 2018 when the European Central Bank warned about the potential risk to those banks which had exposure to the country and the danger that Turkey’s woes could lead to ripple effects throughout the financial system.

Europe’s lenders have cut their loan books to Turkey since 2018 and HSBC (HSBA) has even contemplated withdrawing altogether but if there is going to be a fault line that disturbs financial markets’ current calm, as they look to draw strength from fiscal and monetary policy support for Western economies, a Biden win in America and hopes for a vaccine, a good old-fashioned emerging market crisis could just be it.

Boardroom shuffle

One presidential hard man, America’s Donald J. Trump, looks set to fall from office but another, Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, is as powerful as ever, judging by his decision to sack the head of his country’s central bank for the second time in three years.

The removal of Murat Uysal from the post of governor of the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey and his replacement by Naci Ağbal is prompting further instability, as finance minister Berat Albayrak – president Erdogan’s son-in-law, no less – is quitting at the same time, amid reports he and Ağbal do not entirely agree on policy.

The sacking of Uysal came as a surprise in one way, because he had followed the policies which his president seemed to prefer, in the form of dramatic interest rate cuts.

It was less of a surprise in others, in that the Turkish lira has continued to lose ground, weighed down by concerns over political interference and the dreaded combination of substantial current account and budget deficits.

The currency has lost a third of its value in 2020, relative to the dollar, and has halved in the last three years. Such a slump forced the hand of Uysal, who pushed through a two-percentage point rate hike in September, mirroring the emergency action of his predecessor Murat Çetinkaya in 2018.

The good news is that emerging stock markets are riding through the Turkish turbulence, presumably in the view it represents no more than a little local difficulty. This is a welcome contrast to 2018 when angst in Ankara dragged emerging equities lower pretty much across the board.

Debt dilemma

Nor is the European banking sector looking too troubled. This is despite the Bank of International Settlements’ view that Spanish, French, Italian and British banks have €118 billion in loans to Turkish entities on their books, with Spain in for over half of that and the UK (through HSBC) around a tenth.

Instead, banking shares are rising, buoyed by hopes of the return of dividend payments from the FTSE 100’s ‘Big Five’ lenders in calendar 2021, the prospect of a COVID-19 vaccine and a potential economic recovery that could not only cap loan losses but help to steepen the yield curve and fatten lending margins.

Yet investors must now wait to see what policies Ağbal unveils in his new role as governor of Turkey’s central bank. Raising interest rates does not seem to be an option so that leaves four possible courses of action:

• Turkey could devalue the lira (though the markets seem to be doing that for it anyway). This could help to ease the pressure on interest rates and reduce debt-servicing costs on lira-priced loans while also slowing imports and boosting exports to cut the current account deficit.

• Ankara could find fresh funds. President Erdoğan first came to power (as prime minister) in 2002 thanks to his protests against the austerity package demanded by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in return for help after the 2000-01 crisis so such a policy seems unlikely.

• Turkey could default. This remains a possibility, especially as Erdoğan has in the past called interest rates ‘the mother of all evil’.

• Ankara could impose capital controls. This would stop foreign banks and businesses from withdrawing their cash although it may only stop the rot in the lira for as long as the controls are in place.

Global financial markets would not welcome either of the last two options.

Malaysia imposed capital controls in 1998 and international investors who were stuck with assets stranded in ringgit sold stocks and bonds in other emerging markets to raise liquidity and protect themselves from the danger of similar moves elsewhere.

That eventually rippled around the world and what began as an Asia currency and debt crisis in 1997 became a global one in 1998 and even the FTSE 100 was caught up the melee as it briefly entered a bear market.

None of this is to say that we get a repeat this time, or that Ankara makes the same mistakes as Kuala Lumpur did 22 years ago. But it is a risk that must be watched, especially as markets are at their most vulnerable when they are at their most optimistic.

‹ Previous2020-11-12Next ›