IMI share buyback takes total this year to over £4bn

Writer,

IMI’s announcement of a £200 million cash return to its investors, alongside an upbeat trading statement, takes the total value of share buybacks announced in the UK this year over the £4 billion mark. A bounce in IMI’s shares suggest that shareholders are happy about the prospect of the windfall and the confidence in the future that it signifies.

Announced Company Buyback rogramme confirmed £ million
26-Apr-21 IMI 200
07-Apr-21 Quilter 187
26-Mar-21 D4t4 0.3
19-Mar-21 NatWest Group 1,125
16-Mar-21 Ferguson 290
15-Mar-21 Arix Bioscience 25
15-Mar-21 Raven Property 7
10-Mar-21 Somero Enterprises (2) 1
10-Mar-21 IP Group TBC
10-Mar-21 Balfour Beatty 150
09-Mar-21 Gamesys TBC
09-Mar-21 Domino's Pizza 45
04-Mar-21 CRH 216
04-Mar-21 Sage 300
26-Feb-21 Trans-Siberian Gold 1
26-Feb-21 Rightmove TBC
25-Feb-21 Griffin Mining 7
25-Feb-21 Spectris 200
25-Feb-21 Standard Chartered 181
25-Feb-21 Berkeley Group 129
24-Feb-21 Glanbia 44
22-Feb-21 CML Microsystems 8
18-Feb-21 Barclays 700
18-Feb-21 South32 180
17-Feb-21 Plus500 18
01-Feb-21 Zytronic 10
11-Jan-21 Contour Global 23
  Total 4,048

Source: Company accounts. Not all buyback programmes and have been completed and some are still running, while other companies have yet to declare the intended value

There are four clear arguments in favour of share buybacks.

  • If a company is generating surplus cash it can return it to shareholders and let them decide what to do with it, rather than splurge it on an unnecessary acquisition or capacity increases. Despite the difficult economic backdrop, this is an issue for cash-rich companies when low interest rates mean firms are not gaining a decent return on any liquid assets.
  • Buybacks can work for individuals depending on their tax situation, and whether they prefer to be taxed on a capital gain (buyback) or dividend (income).
  • Any investor who elects to retain their shares when a firm buys back stock will have an enhanced stake in the company and thus be entitled to a bigger share of future dividends (assuming there are any). Buybacks can also be earnings accretive, adding to earnings per share, which can also give a share price a boost as it makes the stock look cheaper on a price-to-earnings (PE) basis, all other things being equal.
  • They can also suggest that a management team feels a company’s shares are undervalued, so any move to buy back stock can be seen as a vote of confidence in the firm’s near and long-term trading prospects.

Yet there are critics of buybacks who view them as a prime example of how firms can seem to prioritise financial engineering and short-term returns over the sort of product development and investment than generate long-term ones.

Investors must therefore consider the four potential downsides that can come with buybacks.

History shows companies have a habit of buying stock back during bull markets (when their stocks tends to be more expensive) and not doing so during bear ones (when their stock tends to be much cheaper). Over £10 billion of buybacks were cancelled in 2020 in the UK, even though share prices were at their lowest – and thus valuations most attractive and buybacks likely to be more earnings enhancing. Companies are now ramping up buybacks after a 40% gain in the FTSE All-Share from its March 2020 lows.

This in turn exposes investors to the risk management teams are buying high rather than low could therefore question whether executives are sufficiently objective when they sanction a buyback to show the market they feel their stock is undervalued.

A buyback could be used to massage earnings per share figures by reducing the share count at limited cost. This could be used to trigger management bonuses or stock options.

There is also the risk that firms buyback stock using debt, potentially weakening their balance sheets and competitive position in the long term (although the same danger lurks with dividends) or exposing them and their shareholders to a any unexpected shock. The share buyback programmes run by America’s quoted airline companies, as well as the FTSE 100’s International Consolidated Airlines, could be seen as examples here.

When it comes to buybacks, it may therefore be worth heeding the words of master investor Warren Buffett from his 2012 letter to shareholders in his Berkshire Hathaway investment vehicle.

Charlie [Munger] and I favour repurchases when two conditions are met: first, a company has ample funds to take care of the operational liquidity and needs of its business; second, its stock is selling at a material discount to the company's intrinsic business value, conservatively calculated.

Bearing this in mind, investors must therefore look at how a company buys back its stock.

  • If it does so in a disciplined manner, clearly setting a maximum price that it is prepared to pay (and explaining why) then the buyback could help to create shareholder value through the efficient deployment of cash.
  • But if a company buys shares at any price – something that could get a professional fund manager the sack for poor performance and do damage to any private investor’s portfolio, since the price and valuation paid for a stock are the ultimate arbiter of the long-term return they make from an investment – then its buyback programme should be treated with scepticism. Such indiscipline would raise suspicions that management is simply trying to massage the share price or earnings targets or both, especially in managers are using cheap debt as a source of funding rather than internally generated cash.

The good news in the case of IMI is that the firm generates high operating margins, offers a healthy balance sheet and interest cover is good, so the firm’s finances are robust – and the figures are 2020 are pandemic-hit so that is a further good sign, although an even more stringent test would be take averages of these key ratios over a full economic cycle, or at least five to ten years, to ensure that they are not being flattered by a cyclical top or unduly depressed by a cyclical low.

Today’s trading statement also suggests that IMI will be funding the buyback out of cash flow rather than borrowing and management makes it clear that investment in growth, either organic or by means of acquisition, still comes first, which is a further positive sign.

IMI plc      
Operating margin (%)     Net debt (cash)  
£ million 2020   £ million 2020
Sales 1,825   Cash 207.9
Operating profit 227   Investments and liquid securities 3.1
Operating margin (%) 12.4%   Pension surplus 69.1
        280.1
Interest cover        
£ million 2020   Short-term debt 73.5
Operating profit 227   Short-term leases 26.3
Interest income 17.9   Long-term debt 362.3
Interest expense (30.6)   Long-term leases 62
Interest cover 8.00 x   Pension obligations 91.1
        615.2
         
      Net debt (cash) 335.1
      Shareholders' funds 799.5
      Gearing ratio 42%

Source: Company accounts

Buybacks do seem to be coming back into favour. In some ways, investors’ desire to see ‘efficient’ balance sheets once more, that carry little, low-earnings cash, is remarkable just a year after they were craving financial solidity above almost all else. But the London-quoted Invesco Global Buyback Achievers Exchange Traded Fund (ETF), which aims to deliver the share price performance the NASDAQ Global Buyback Achievers index, plunged last year but has almost doubled from its lows, easily outpacing the FTSE All-Share in the meantime.

Chart - NYSE data to February 2010, FINRA data from February 2010

Source: Refinitiv data

The NASDAQ Global Buyback Achievers Index represents a basket of firms which have reduced their share count through buybacks by at least 5% over the previous 12 months. Sixty percent of the holdings by value hail from America, 20% from Japan, 6% from Canada and just 2% from the UK, while by sector 26% comes from technology and 19% from financials.

These articles are for information purposes only and are not a personal recommendation or advice.


russmould's picture
Written by:
Russ Mould

Russ Mould has 28 years' experience of the capital markets. He started at Scottish Equitable in 1991 as a fund manager and in 1993 he joined SG Warburg, now part of UBS investment bank, where he worked as equity analyst covering the technology sector for 12 years. Russ joined Shares in November 2005 as technology correspondent and became Editor of the magazine in July 2008. Following the acquisition of Shares' parent company, MSM Media by AJ Bell Group, he was appointed AJ Bell’s Investment Director in summer 2013.